Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJS vs SCHH: how they differ
IJS and SCHH hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and Schwab U.S. REIT ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJS and SCHH hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJS | SCHH |
|---|---|---|
| MACERICH COMPANY (THE) | 0.37% | 0.44% |
| BROADSTONE NET LEASE INC | 0.32% | 0.27% |
| PHILLIPS EDISON & COMPANY INC | 0.24% | 0.36% |
| ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST INC | 0.23% | 0.46% |
| APPLE HOSPITALITY REIT INC | 0.40% | 0.23% |
| SL GREEN REALTY CORP | 0.40% | 0.23% |
| TERRENO REALTY CORP | 0.23% | 0.49% |
| MILLROSE PROPERTIES INC | 0.21% | 0.31% |
| ACADIA REALTY TRUST | 0.30% | 0.20% |
| HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES INC | 0.36% | 0.20% |
| MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST INC | 0.25% | 0.18% |
| OUTFRONT MEDIA INC | 0.18% | 0.33% |
| Only in IJS | Only in SCHH |
|---|---|
| MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 1.30% | Welltower Inc 9.64% |
| MATCH GROUP INC 0.97% | Prologis Inc 8.97% |
| EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY 0.84% | Equinix Inc 4.89% |
| CARMAX INC 0.82% | Simon Property Group Inc 4.48% |
| KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC 0.77% | Digital Realty Trust Inc 4.36% |
| POOL CORP 0.75% | American Tower Corp 4.35% |
| LKQ CORP 0.73% | Realty Income Corp 4.00% |
| VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC 0.73% | Public Storage 3.41% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | SCHH Schwab U.S. REIT ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Schwab |
| What it is | S&P Small-Cap 600 Value | US REIT |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.1% | +9.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.7 pts | −7.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 74.0% |
| Holdings | 461 | 117 |
IJS in plain words
IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 8.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SCHH in plain words
SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJS or SCHH?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +22.1% and SCHH returned +9.8%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJS or SCHH?
- IJS charges 0.18% a year and SCHH charges 0.07%, so SCHH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJS and SCHH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 74% of SCHH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJS against SCHH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJS-SCHH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources