Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJS vs IYW: how they differ

IJS and IYW hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and iShares U.S. Technology ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJS and IYW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJS and IYW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJSIYW
MATCH GROUP INC0.97%0.05%
QORVO INC0.30%0.05%
PAYCOM SOFTWARE INC0.57%0.04%
EPAM SYSTEMS INC0.45%0.04%
RINGCENTRAL INC0.13%0.02%
PEOPLE INC0.32%0.02%
TERADATA CORP0.15%0.01%
DXC TECHNOLOGY COMPANY0.16%0.01%
ZOOMINFO TECHNOLOGIES INC0.04%0.01%
DOUBLEVERIFY HOLDINGS INC0.06%0.01%
CONCENTRIX CORP0.11%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJSOnly in IYW
MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 1.30%NVIDIA CORPORATION 16.25%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY 0.84%APPLE INC. 13.65%
CARMAX INC 0.82%ALPHABET INC. 7.84%
KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC 0.77%ALPHABET INC. 6.34%
POOL CORP 0.75%MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.99%
LKQ CORP 0.73%BROADCOM INC. 3.78%
VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC 0.73%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.50%
VICTORIA'S SECRET & COMPANY 0.72%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2.98%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IJS and IYW on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJS
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isS&P Small-Cap 600 ValueU.S. Technology
Total return, 1 year+22.1%+34.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.7 pts+17.4 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.37%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%95.5%
Holdings461139

IJS in plain words

IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 8.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJS or IYW?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +22.1% and IYW returned +34.9%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJS or IYW?
IJS charges 0.18% a year and IYW charges 0.37%, so IJS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJS and IYW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 96% of IYW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJS against IYW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJS against IYW, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJS-IYW Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources