Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJS vs ITOT: how they differ

IJS and ITOT hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.

iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJS and ITOT hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJS and ITOT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJSITOT
MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC1.30%0.02%
ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC0.60%0.01%
MAXLINEAR INC0.67%0.01%
GLAUKOS CORP0.28%0.01%
MATCH GROUP INC0.97%0.01%
RALLIANT CORP0.43%0.01%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY0.84%0.01%
PLEXUS CORP0.49%0.01%
ARCOSA INC0.28%0.01%
CARMAX INC0.82%0.01%
KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC0.77%0.01%
LUMEN TECHNOLOGIES INC0.44%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJSOnly in ITOT
ICHOR HOLDINGS LTD 0.43%NVIDIA Corp. 6.64%
SIGNET JEWELERS LTD 0.38%Apple, Inc. 5.82%
GATES INDUSTRIAL CORP PLC 0.36%Microsoft Corp. 3.80%
CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD LTD 0.34%Amazon.com, Inc. 3.20%
VERSIGENT PLC 0.33%Alphabet, Inc. 2.87%
NOBLE CORP PLC 0.24%Broadcom, Inc. 2.45%
ASSURED GUARANTY LTD 0.17%Alphabet, Inc. 2.29%
ADIENT PLC 0.16%Micron Technology, Inc. 1.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IJS and ITOT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJS
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isS&P Small-Cap 600 ValueCore S&P Total U.S. Stock Market
Total return, 1 year+22.1%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.7 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.03%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%88.3%
Holdings4612497

IJS in plain words

IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 8.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJS or ITOT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +22.1% and ITOT returned +17.2%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJS or ITOT?
IJS charges 0.18% a year and ITOT charges 0.03%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJS and ITOT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 88% of ITOT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJS against ITOT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJS against ITOT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJS-ITOT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources