Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJR vs VHT: how they differ

IJR and VHT hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and VHT returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJR and VHT hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJR and VHT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJRVHT
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC0.61%0.14%
MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC0.66%0.14%
KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC0.54%0.11%
CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INC0.46%0.10%
GLAUKOS CORP0.46%0.09%
TG THERAPEUTICS INC0.40%0.09%
TELEFLEX INC0.31%0.09%
PTC THERAPEUTICS INC0.38%0.08%
PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS INC0.41%0.08%
LIGAND PHARMACEUTICALS INC0.35%0.07%
INDIVIOR PHARMACEUTICALS INC0.28%0.06%
LIQUIDIA CORP0.31%0.06%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJROnly in VHT
FORMFACTOR INC 0.69%Eli Lilly & Co 14.07%
VIASAT INC 0.68%Johnson & Johnson 8.48%
ARGAN INC 0.62%AbbVie Inc 6.10%
ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 0.61%UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.46%
MAXLINEAR INC 0.60%Merck & Co Inc 4.67%
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.50%Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 2.93%
MATCH GROUP INC 0.49%Amgen Inc 2.87%
ALKERMES PLC 0.48%Gilead Sciences Inc 2.64%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IJR and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
VHT
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isS&P SmallCap 600Health Care
Total return, 1 year+19.9%+21.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+2.4 pts+4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.09%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%85.6%
Holdings603401

IJR in plain words

IJR is an index equity fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 603 positions, with the top ten at 6.0%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJR or VHT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJR returned +19.9% and VHT returned +21.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJR or VHT?
IJR charges 0.06% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so IJR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJR and VHT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJR and 86% of VHT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJR against VHT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJR against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJR-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources