Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJR vs ONEQ: how they differ

IJR and ONEQ hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJR and ONEQ hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJR and ONEQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJRONEQ
VIASAT INC0.68%0.03%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC0.61%0.03%
POWELL INDUSTRIES INC0.45%0.02%
STONEX GROUP INC0.47%0.02%
MYR GROUP INC0.43%0.02%
KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC0.54%0.02%
MATCH GROUP INC0.49%0.02%
PLEXUS CORP0.45%0.02%
QORVO INC0.41%0.02%
FORMFACTOR INC0.69%0.02%
LKQ CORP0.37%0.02%
MERCURY SYSTEMS INC0.36%0.02%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJROnly in ONEQ
MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 0.66%NVIDIA CORP 11.24%
ARGAN INC 0.62%APPLE INC 10.04%
ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 0.61%MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.50%AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%
ALKERMES PLC 0.48%ALPHABET INC 4.85%
EVERUS CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC 0.47%BROADCOM INC 4.64%
RALLIANT CORP 0.46%ALPHABET INC 4.48%
GLAUKOS CORP 0.46%TESLA INC 3.58%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IJR and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesFidelity
What it isS&P SmallCap 600Nasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year+19.9%+20.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+2.4 pts+3.1 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.21%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%87.4%
Holdings6031022

IJR in plain words

IJR is an index equity fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 603 positions, with the top ten at 6.0%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJR or ONEQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJR returned +19.9% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJR or ONEQ?
IJR charges 0.06% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so IJR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJR and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJR and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJR against ONEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJR against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJR-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources