Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJR vs IWM
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF and iShares Russell 2000 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJR and IWM hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJR | IWM |
|---|---|---|
| VIASAT INC | 0.68% | 0.35% |
| BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC | 0.61% | 0.35% |
| MAXLINEAR INC | 0.60% | 0.34% |
| ARGAN INC | 0.62% | 0.34% |
| KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC | 0.54% | 0.30% |
| ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC | 0.50% | 0.29% |
| STONEX GROUP INC | 0.47% | 0.27% |
| PLEXUS CORP | 0.45% | 0.25% |
| ENPRO INC | 0.44% | 0.25% |
| RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES INC | 0.45% | 0.25% |
| GLAUKOS CORP | 0.46% | 0.25% |
| TG THERAPEUTICS INC | 0.40% | 0.25% |
| Only in IJR | Only in IWM |
|---|---|
| FORMFACTOR INC 0.69% | Moog, Inc. 0.38% |
| MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 0.66% | Hut 8 Corp. 0.37% |
| ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 0.61% | Cytokinetics, Inc. 0.35% |
| MATCH GROUP INC 0.49% | UMB Financial Corp. 0.33% |
| ALKERMES PLC 0.48% | JFrog Ltd. 0.31% |
| EVERUS CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC 0.47% | Riot Platforms, Inc. 0.30% |
| CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS INC 0.46% | CareTrust REIT, Inc. 0.28% |
| RALLIANT CORP 0.46% | Old National Bancorp 0.28% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.
| IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | S&P SmallCap 600 | Russell 2000 |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.0% | +26.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.0 pts | +6.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.19% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 603 | 2014 |
IJR in plain words
IJR is a index equity fund tracking S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +24.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 603 positions, with the top ten at 6.0%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.
IWM in plain words
IWM is a index equity fund tracking Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJR or IWM?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJR returned +24.0% and IWM returned +26.4%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJR or IWM?
- IJR charges 0.06% a year and IWM charges 0.19%, so IJR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJR and IWM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJR and 0% of IWM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 46% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJR against IWM, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJR-IWM.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources