Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJH vs IWM
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and iShares Russell 2000 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJH and IWM hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJH | IWM |
|---|---|---|
| MOOG INC | 0.33% | 0.38% |
| CYTOKINETICS INC | 0.32% | 0.35% |
| UMB FINANCIAL CORP | 0.28% | 0.33% |
| CARETRUST REIT INC | 0.26% | 0.28% |
| OLD NATIONAL BANCORP | 0.25% | 0.28% |
| ENERSYS | 0.24% | 0.27% |
| FIRSTCASH HOLDINGS INC | 0.23% | 0.28% |
| TEREX CORP | 0.23% | 0.26% |
| HEALTHEQUITY INC | 0.21% | 0.24% |
| HIMS & HERS HEALTH INC | 0.20% | 0.23% |
| INTERDIGITAL INC | 0.20% | 0.23% |
| FLUOR CORP | 0.20% | 0.23% |
| Only in IJH | Only in IWM |
|---|---|
| TWILIO INC 0.86% | Hut 8 Corp. 0.37% |
| CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85% | Viasat, Inc. 0.35% |
| MKS INC 0.83% | BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 0.35% |
| CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77% | MaxLinear, Inc. 0.34% |
| NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76% | Argan, Inc. 0.34% |
| ENTEGRIS INC 0.76% | JFrog Ltd. 0.31% |
| ATI INC 0.74% | Riot Platforms, Inc. 0.30% |
| ILLUMINA INC 0.73% | Krystal Biotech, Inc. 0.30% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.
| IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | S&P MidCap 400 | Russell 2000 |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.9% | +26.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −3.0 pts | +6.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.19% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 400 | 2014 |
IJH in plain words
IJH is a index equity fund tracking S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +16.9% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.
IWM in plain words
IWM is a index equity fund tracking Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2014 positions, with the top ten at 3.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJH or IWM?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +16.9% and IWM returned +26.4%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJH or IWM?
- IJH charges 0.05% a year and IWM charges 0.19%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJH and IWM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 0% of IWM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against IWM, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJH-IWM.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources