Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BND vs IJR
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF.
| BND Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund | IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | iShares |
| What it is | US aggregate bonds | S&P SmallCap 600 |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.3% | +24.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +20.0% | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −18.7 pts | +4.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.06% |
| Holdings | n/a | 603 |
BND in plain words
BND is a bond fund tracking US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
IJR in plain words
IJR is a index equity fund tracking S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +24.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 603 positions, with the top ten at 6.0%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BND or IJR?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned +1.3% and IJR returned +24.0%, so IJR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, BND or IJR?
- BND charges 0.03% a year and IJR charges 0.06%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BND against IJR, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BND-IJR.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources