Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJH vs XRT: how they differ

IJH and XRT hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and IJH returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJH and XRT hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJH and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJHXRT
BURLINGTON STORES INC0.55%1.31%
DICKS SPORTING GOODS INC0.41%1.43%
BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB HOLDINGS INC0.31%1.27%
FIVE BELOW INC0.27%1.24%
GAMESTOP CORP0.25%1.33%
MURPHY USA INC0.25%1.19%
SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET INC0.22%1.32%
MAPLEBEAR INC0.21%1.55%
LITHIA MOTORS INC0.18%1.29%
MACY'S INC0.17%1.38%
VALVOLINE INC0.14%1.47%
ALBERTSONS COMPANIES INC0.13%1.20%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJHOnly in XRT
TWILIO INC 0.86%Groupon Inc 1.78%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85%RealReal Inc/The 1.75%
MKS INC 0.83%Warby Parker Inc 1.64%
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%Upbound Group Inc 1.59%
ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%Coupang Inc 1.55%
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%Revolve Group Inc 1.52%
ATI INC 0.74%Victoria's Secret & Co 1.52%
ILLUMINA INC 0.73%MarineMax Inc 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IJH and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isS&P MidCap 400SPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+13.4%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.1 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.35%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%22.5%
Holdings40075

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJH or XRT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and XRT returned −3.0%, so IJH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJH or XRT?
IJH charges 0.05% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJH and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJH against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJH-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources