Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJH vs VPU: how they differ

IJH and VPU hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and IJH returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and Vanguard Utilities Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJH and VPU hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJH and VPU both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJHVPU
TALEN ENERGY CORP0.48%0.99%
ESSENTIAL UTILITIES INC0.30%0.69%
OGE ENERGY CORP0.28%0.64%
IDACORP INC0.23%0.50%
UGI CORP0.20%0.50%
NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY0.20%0.46%
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES INC0.18%0.44%
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY0.17%0.37%
SOUTHWEST GAS HOLDINGS INC0.16%0.35%
BLACK HILLS CORP0.16%0.36%
NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP0.16%0.37%
TXNM ENERGY INC0.16%0.38%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJHOnly in VPU
TWILIO INC 0.86%NextEra Energy Inc 11.84%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85%Southern Co/The 6.70%
MKS INC 0.83%Duke Energy Corp 6.31%
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%Constellation Energy Corp 5.86%
ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%American Electric Power Co Inc 4.47%
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%Sempra 3.85%
ATI INC 0.74%Dominion Energy Inc 3.78%
ILLUMINA INC 0.73%Vistra Corp 3.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IJH and VPU on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
VPU
Vanguard Utilities Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isS&P MidCap 400Utilities
Total return, 1 year+13.4%+2.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.1 pts−15.4 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.09%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%90.1%
Holdings40066

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VPU in plain words

VPU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 52.7%. It sat 9.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJH or VPU?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and VPU returned +2.1%, so IJH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJH or VPU?
IJH charges 0.05% a year and VPU charges 0.09%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJH and VPU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 90% of VPU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJH against VPU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against VPU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJH-VPU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources