Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJH vs VBK: how they differ

IJH and VBK hold 43% of their weight in the same names.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJH and VBK hold 43% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJH and VBK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJHVBK
TWILIO INC0.86%0.88%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP0.85%0.82%
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP0.77%0.79%
ENTEGRIS INC0.76%0.77%
ATI INC0.74%0.76%
MASTEC INC0.71%0.74%
WOODWARD INC0.70%0.71%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC0.71%0.69%
MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS INC0.69%0.74%
EVERPURE INC0.69%0.70%
XPO INC0.67%0.65%
OKTA INC0.63%0.65%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJHOnly in VBK
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.27%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 1.07%
US FOODS HOLDING CORP 0.62%Astera Labs Inc 1.05%
FABRINET 0.56%Natera Inc 1.04%
TD SYNNEX CORP 0.55%Casey's General Stores Inc 0.83%
RELIANCE INC 0.53%FTAI Aviation Ltd 0.78%
EAST WEST BANCORP INC 0.49%nVent Electric PLC 0.77%
PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP COMPANY 0.48%TechnipFMC PLC 0.74%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IJH and VBK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isS&P MidCap 400Small-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+13.4%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.1 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.05%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%10.2%
Holdings400545

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJH or VBK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and VBK returned +13.8%, so VBK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJH or VBK?
IJH charges 0.05% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJH and VBK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 10% of VBK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 43% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJH against VBK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against VBK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJH-VBK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources