Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJH vs KRE: how they differ
IJH and KRE hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and KRE returned more over the year.
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJH and KRE hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJH | KRE |
|---|---|---|
| EAST WEST BANCORP INC | 0.49% | 1.28% |
| PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS INC | 0.42% | 1.37% |
| WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORP | 0.34% | 1.35% |
| FIRST HORIZON CORP | 0.34% | 1.31% |
| WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORP | 0.30% | 1.32% |
| UMB FINANCIAL CORP | 0.28% | 1.37% |
| ZIONS BANCORP NA | 0.28% | 1.33% |
| SOUTHSTATE BANK CORP | 0.27% | 1.31% |
| CULLEN/FROST BANKERS INC | 0.27% | 1.35% |
| COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM INC | 0.26% | 1.34% |
| OLD NATIONAL BANCORP | 0.25% | 1.35% |
| WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORP | 0.23% | 1.28% |
| Only in IJH | Only in KRE |
|---|---|
| TWILIO INC 0.86% | Atlantic Union Bankshares Corp 1.37% |
| CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85% | Citizens Financial Group Inc 1.37% |
| MKS INC 0.83% | First Interstate BancSystem Inc 1.35% |
| CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77% | Fulton Financial Corp 1.35% |
| ENTEGRIS INC 0.76% | M&T Bank Corp 1.35% |
| NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76% | Regions Financial Corp 1.34% |
| ATI INC 0.74% | BOK Financial Corp 1.34% |
| ILLUMINA INC 0.73% | Huntington Bancshares Inc/OH 1.33% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | KRE State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | S&P MidCap 400 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.4% | +16.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −4.1 pts | −1.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 6.7% |
| Holdings | 400 | 161 |
IJH in plain words
IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
KRE in plain words
KRE is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 161 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJH or KRE?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and KRE returned +16.1%, so KRE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJH or KRE?
- IJH charges 0.05% a year and KRE charges 0.35%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJH and KRE overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 7% of KRE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against KRE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJH-KRE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources