Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJH vs IYW: how they differ

IJH and IYW hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and iShares U.S. Technology ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJH and IYW hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJH and IYW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJHIYW
EVERPURE INC0.69%0.14%
ENTEGRIS INC0.76%0.13%
TWILIO INC0.86%0.13%
MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS INC0.69%0.12%
TD SYNNEX CORP0.55%0.11%
LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP0.58%0.10%
ONTO INNOVATION INC0.52%0.09%
OKTA INC0.63%0.08%
GUIDEWIRE SOFTWARE INC0.29%0.07%
PINTEREST INC0.28%0.07%
CACI INTERNATIONAL INC0.28%0.07%
DYNATRACE INC0.36%0.07%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJHOnly in IYW
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85%NVIDIA CORPORATION 16.25%
MKS INC 0.83%APPLE INC. 13.65%
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%ALPHABET INC. 7.84%
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%ALPHABET INC. 6.34%
ATI INC 0.74%MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.99%
ILLUMINA INC 0.73%BROADCOM INC. 3.78%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 3.50%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC 0.71%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2.98%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IJH and IYW on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isS&P MidCap 400U.S. Technology
Total return, 1 year+13.4%+34.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.1 pts+17.4 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.37%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%95.5%
Holdings400139

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJH or IYW?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and IYW returned +34.9%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJH or IYW?
IJH charges 0.05% a year and IYW charges 0.37%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJH and IYW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 96% of IYW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJH against IYW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against IYW, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJH-IYW Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources