Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJH vs ITOT: how they differ

IJH and ITOT hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and ITOT returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJH and ITOT hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJH and ITOT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJHITOT
TWILIO INC0.86%0.04%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP0.85%0.04%
MKS INC0.83%0.04%
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP0.77%0.04%
ENTEGRIS INC0.76%0.04%
ATI INC0.74%0.04%
ILLUMINA INC0.73%0.04%
MASTEC INC0.71%0.04%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC0.71%0.04%
WOODWARD INC0.70%0.04%
EVERPURE INC0.69%0.03%
MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS INC0.69%0.03%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJHOnly in ITOT
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%NVIDIA Corp. 6.64%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%Apple, Inc. 5.82%
FABRINET 0.56%Microsoft Corp. 3.80%
ROIVANT SCIENCES LTD 0.44%Amazon.com, Inc. 3.20%
JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS PLC 0.42%Alphabet, Inc. 2.87%
RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD 0.37%Broadcom, Inc. 2.45%
SHARKNINJA INC 0.30%Alphabet, Inc. 2.29%
CNH INDUSTRIAL NV 0.27%Micron Technology, Inc. 1.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IJH and ITOT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isS&P MidCap 400Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market
Total return, 1 year+13.4%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.1 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.03%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%88.3%
Holdings4002497

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJH or ITOT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and ITOT returned +17.2%, so ITOT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJH or ITOT?
IJH charges 0.05% a year and ITOT charges 0.03%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJH and ITOT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 88% of ITOT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJH against ITOT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against ITOT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJH-ITOT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources