Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IGM vs VYM: how they differ

IGM and VYM hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IGM and VYM hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IGM and VYM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIGMVYM
Broadcom, Inc.7.61%8.07%
Cisco Systems, Inc.2.02%1.52%
Oracle Corp.1.08%1.14%
Texas Instruments, Inc.1.18%1.07%
International Business Machines Corp.1.15%0.90%
Analog Devices, Inc.0.85%0.82%
QUALCOMM, Inc.0.85%0.80%
Dell Technologies, Inc.0.55%0.27%
Microchip Technology, Inc.0.22%0.20%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.0.26%0.16%
NetApp, Inc.0.13%0.09%
VeriSign, Inc.0.09%0.09%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IGMOnly in VYM
NVIDIA Corp. 7.97%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.36%
Apple, Inc. 7.92%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.73%
Microsoft Corp. 7.50%Johnson & Johnson 2.31%
Micron Technology, Inc. 5.47%Caterpillar Inc 1.73%
Alphabet, Inc. 4.45%AbbVie Inc 1.57%
Meta Platforms, Inc. 4.17%Chevron Corp 1.51%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.13%Bank of America Corp 1.45%
Alphabet, Inc. 3.55%Procter & Gamble Co/The 1.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IGM and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isExpanded Tech SectorUS high dividend
Total return, 1 year+32.7%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+15.2 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50092.0%92.2%
Holdings295608

IGM in plain words

IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VYM in plain words

VYM is an index equity fund tracking the US high dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 608 positions, with the top ten at 25.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IGM or VYM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +32.7% and VYM returned +17.6%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IGM or VYM?
IGM charges 0.37% a year and VYM charges 0.04%, so VYM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IGM and VYM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IGM and 92% of VYM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IGM against VYM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGM against VYM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IGM-VYM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources