Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IGM vs SPY: how they differ

IGM and SPY hold 46% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IGM and SPY hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IGM and SPY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIGMSPY
NVIDIA Corp.7.97%7.52%
Apple, Inc.7.92%6.59%
Microsoft Corp.7.50%4.30%
Alphabet, Inc.4.45%3.25%
Broadcom, Inc.7.61%2.77%
Alphabet, Inc.3.55%2.59%
Micron Technology, Inc.5.47%2.02%
Meta Platforms, Inc.4.17%1.92%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.4.13%1.47%
Intel Corp.2.88%1.02%
Applied Materials, Inc.2.50%0.89%
Lam Research Corp.2.37%0.84%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IGMOnly in SPY
Shopify, Inc. 0.61%Amazon.com, Inc. 3.62%
Snowflake, Inc. 0.38%Tesla, Inc. 1.84%
Cloudflare, Inc. 0.34%Eli Lilly & Co. 1.47%
Astera Labs, Inc. 0.28%Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. 1.42%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. 0.19%JPMorgan Chase & Co. 1.36%
Celestica, Inc. 0.18%Johnson & Johnson 0.95%
ROBLOX Corp. 0.16%Visa, Inc. 0.88%
Twilio, Inc. 0.14%Exxon Mobil Corp. 0.88%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IGM and SPY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isExpanded Tech SectorS&P 500, book from IVV
Total return, 1 year+32.7%+17.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+15.2 pts0.0 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50092.0%100.0%
Holdings295504

IGM in plain words

IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPY in plain words

SPY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IGM or SPY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +32.7% and SPY returned +17.5%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IGM or SPY?
IGM charges 0.37% a year and SPY charges 0.09%, so SPY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IGM and SPY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IGM and 100% of SPY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 46% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IGM against SPY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGM against SPY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IGM-SPY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources