Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IGM vs SDY: how they differ

IGM and SDY hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IGM and SDY hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IGM and SDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIGMSDY
Texas Instruments, Inc.1.18%1.56%
International Business Machines Corp.1.15%1.27%
QUALCOMM, Inc.0.85%1.57%
Analog Devices, Inc.0.85%0.61%
Microsoft Corp.7.50%0.36%
Microchip Technology, Inc.0.22%1.32%
Roper Technologies, Inc.0.15%0.40%
Badger Meter, Inc.0.02%0.27%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IGMOnly in SDY
NVIDIA Corp. 7.97%Verizon Communications Inc 2.15%
Apple, Inc. 7.92%Realty Income Corp 2.14%
Broadcom, Inc. 7.61%Kenvue Inc 1.76%
Micron Technology, Inc. 5.47%Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75%
Alphabet, Inc. 4.45%AbbVie Inc 1.63%
Meta Platforms, Inc. 4.17%Target Corp 1.55%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.13%Automatic Data Processing Inc 1.54%
Alphabet, Inc. 3.55%Edison International 1.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IGM and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isExpanded Tech SectorSPDR S&P Dividend
Total return, 1 year+32.7%+11.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+15.2 pts−6.5 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50092.0%84.6%
Holdings295155

IGM in plain words

IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IGM or SDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +32.7% and SDY returned +11.0%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IGM or SDY?
IGM charges 0.37% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so SDY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IGM and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IGM and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IGM against SDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGM against SDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IGM-SDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources