Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IGM vs ITOT: how they differ
IGM and ITOT hold 43% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IGM and ITOT hold 43% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IGM | ITOT |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. | 7.97% | 6.64% |
| Apple, Inc. | 7.92% | 5.82% |
| Microsoft Corp. | 7.50% | 3.80% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 4.45% | 2.87% |
| Broadcom, Inc. | 7.61% | 2.45% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 3.55% | 2.29% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. | 5.47% | 1.78% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. | 4.17% | 1.70% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 4.13% | 1.30% |
| Intel Corp. | 2.88% | 0.90% |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 2.50% | 0.79% |
| Lam Research Corp. | 2.37% | 0.74% |
| Only in IGM | Only in ITOT |
|---|---|
| Shopify, Inc. 0.61% | Amazon.com, Inc. 3.20% |
| Celestica, Inc. 0.18% | Tesla, Inc. 1.62% |
| CGI, Inc. 0.05% | Eli Lilly & Co. 1.30% |
| BlackBerry Ltd. 0.03% | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. 1.26% |
| Descartes Systems Group, Inc. (The) 0.03% | JPMorgan Chase & Co. 1.20% |
| Open Text Corp. 0.02% | Johnson & Johnson 0.84% |
| Lightspeed Commerce, Inc. 0.01% | Visa, Inc. 0.78% |
| Ambiq Micro, Inc. 0.00% | Exxon Mobil Corp. 0.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Expanded Tech Sector | Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market |
| Total return, 1 year | +32.7% | +17.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +15.2 pts | −0.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 92.0% | 88.3% |
| Holdings | 295 | 2497 |
IGM in plain words
IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
ITOT in plain words
ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IGM or ITOT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +32.7% and ITOT returned +17.2%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IGM or ITOT?
- IGM charges 0.37% a year and ITOT charges 0.03%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IGM and ITOT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IGM and 88% of ITOT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 43% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGM against ITOT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IGM-ITOT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources