Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IEMG vs ONEQ: how they differ

IEMG and ONEQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IEMG returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IEMG and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IEMG and ONEQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIEMGONEQ
PDD Holdings Inc.0.41%0.12%
H World Group Limited0.06%0.01%
JOYY INC.0.01%0.01%
Kanzhun Ltd0.04%0.01%
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd0.01%0.01%
Legend Biotech Corp0.01%0.01%
Sigma Lithium Corp0.01%0.01%
Qfin Holdings, Inc.0.01%0.01%
VNET Group, Inc.0.01%0.00%
OZON MKPAO0.00%0.00%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IEMGOnly in ONEQ
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 12.52%NVIDIA CORP 11.24%
SK hynix Inc. 5.83%APPLE INC 10.04%
Tencent Holdings Limited 2.38%MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%
Alibaba Group Holding Limited 1.83%AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%
MediaTek Inc. 1.42%ALPHABET INC 4.85%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.03%BROADCOM INC 4.64%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.79%ALPHABET INC 4.48%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.74%TESLA INC 3.58%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

IEMG and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesFidelity
What it isCore MSCI Emerging MarketsNasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year+30.6%+20.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.1 pts+3.1 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.21%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%87.4%
Holdings26951022

IEMG in plain words

IEMG is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +30.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2695 positions, with the top ten at 34.1%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEMG or ONEQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEMG returned +30.6% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so IEMG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IEMG or ONEQ?
IEMG charges 0.09% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so IEMG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IEMG and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEMG and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IEMG against ONEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEMG against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IEMG-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources