Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IEMG vs LYTE: how they differ

IEMG and LYTE are measured over different days, and IEMG charges 0.09% against 0.65%.

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF.

IEMG and LYTE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
LYTE
Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundThematic ETF
IssueriSharesRoundhill
What it isCore MSCI Emerging MarketsPhotonics and optics
Total return, 1 year+30.6%−0.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%−0.6%
Gap to the S&P 500+13.1 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.65%
Holdings2695not filed

IEMG in plain words

IEMG is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +30.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2695 positions, with the top ten at 34.1%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

LYTE in plain words

LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it launched on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested against −0.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 11.4% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, IEMG or LYTE?
IEMG charges 0.09% a year and LYTE charges 0.65%, so IEMG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are IEMG and LYTE the same kind of fund?
No. IEMG is an index ETF and LYTE is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IEMG against LYTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEMG against LYTE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IEMG-LYTE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources