Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IEMG vs IWB: how they differ
IEMG and IWB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IEMG returned more over the year.
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IEMG and IWB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IEMG | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| Nu Holdings Ltd. | 0.31% | 0.07% |
| SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION | 0.12% | 0.02% |
| XP Inc. | 0.04% | 0.01% |
| JBS N.V. | 0.04% | 0.01% |
| Aura Minerals Inc. | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| Only in IEMG | Only in IWB |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 12.52% | NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.73% |
| SK hynix Inc. 5.83% | APPLE INC. 6.03% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 2.38% | MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.00% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 1.83% | AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.33% |
| MediaTek Inc. 1.42% | ALPHABET INC. 3.00% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.03% | BROADCOM INC. 2.54% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.79% | ALPHABET INC. 2.42% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.74% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1.88% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Core MSCI Emerging Markets | Russell 1000 |
| Total return, 1 year | +30.6% | +16.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +13.1 pts | −0.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 91.9% |
| Holdings | 2695 | 1024 |
IEMG in plain words
IEMG is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +30.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2695 positions, with the top ten at 34.1%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWB in plain words
IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IEMG or IWB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEMG returned +30.6% and IWB returned +16.7%, so IEMG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IEMG or IWB?
- IEMG charges 0.09% a year and IWB charges 0.15%, so IEMG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IEMG and IWB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEMG and 92% of IWB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEMG against IWB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IEMG-IWB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources