Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IEFA vs VPL: how they differ

IEFA and VPL hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and VPL returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF and Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and VPL hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IEFA and VPL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIEFAVPL
Kirin Holdings Company, Limited0.05%0.11%
CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust0.05%0.09%
CapitaLand Ascendas REIT0.03%0.07%
TOPPAN Holdings Inc.0.03%0.06%
TOYO SUISAN KAISHA, LTD.0.03%0.05%
Pro Medicus Ltd0.02%0.04%
SITC International Holdings Co Ltd0.02%0.05%
BROTHER INDUSTRIES, LTD.0.02%0.04%
Keppel DC REIT0.02%0.03%
Mapletree Industrial Trust0.01%0.03%
NETLINK NBN TRUST0.01%0.02%
Keppel REIT0.01%0.02%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IEFAOnly in VPL
ASML Holding N.V. 2.23%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 6.06%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.25%SK hynix Inc 4.12%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.17%Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.80%
Novartis AG 1.11%Toyota Motor Corp 1.74%
Nestle S.A. 1.03%Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.69%
SHELL PLC 1.03%BHP Group Ltd 1.66%
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 0.90%Hitachi Ltd 1.18%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.84%Advantest Corp 1.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

IEFA and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
VPL
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore MSCI EAFEPacific Stock
Total return, 1 year+18.0%+36.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.5 pts+19.4 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.07%
Already in the S&P 5000.1%0.1%
Holdings26322335

IEFA in plain words

IEFA is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2632 positions, with the top ten at 11.5%.

VPL in plain words

VPL is an index equity fund tracking the Pacific Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +36.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2335 positions, with the top ten at 21.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or VPL?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +18.0% and VPL returned +36.9%, so VPL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IEFA or VPL?
IEFA charges 0.07% a year and VPL charges 0.07%, so IEFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IEFA and VPL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEFA and 0% of VPL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IEFA against VPL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEFA against VPL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IEFA-VPL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources