Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IDEV vs VXUS: how they differ
IDEV and VXUS hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and VXUS returned more over the year.
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF and Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IDEV and VXUS hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IDEV | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| ROYAL BANK OF CANADA | 0.87% | 0.59% |
| THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK | 0.63% | 0.43% |
| Allianz SE | 0.60% | 0.41% |
| Siemens Energy AG | 0.57% | 0.37% |
| UBS Group AG | 0.49% | 0.33% |
| Enbridge Inc. | 0.42% | 0.28% |
| Deutsche Telekom AG | 0.41% | 0.26% |
| BANK OF MONTREAL | 0.38% | 0.25% |
| GSK PLC | 0.37% | 0.25% |
| CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE | 0.36% | 0.25% |
| Zurich Insurance Group AG | 0.35% | 0.24% |
| CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED | 0.34% | 0.23% |
| Only in IDEV | Only in VXUS |
|---|---|
| ASML Holding N.V. 1.95% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.97% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.09% | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.67% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.02% | ASML Holding NV 1.32% |
| Novartis AG 0.97% | SK hynix Inc 1.14% |
| SHELL PLC 0.90% | Tencent Holdings Ltd 0.89% |
| Nestle S.A. 0.90% | HSBC Holdings PLC 0.74% |
| Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 0.78% | Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.69% |
| COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.73% | AstraZeneca PLC 0.67% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Core MSCI International Developed Markets | Total International Stock |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +22.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | +4.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.05% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 2268 | 8775 |
IDEV in plain words
IDEV is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI International Developed Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2268 positions, with the top ten at 10.2%.
VXUS in plain words
VXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8775 positions, with the top ten at 12.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IDEV or VXUS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IDEV returned +18.7% and VXUS returned +22.3%, so VXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IDEV or VXUS?
- IDEV charges 0.04% a year and VXUS charges 0.05%, so IDEV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IDEV and VXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IDEV and 0% of VXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IDEV against VXUS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IDEV-VXUS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources