Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IDEV vs VEU: how they differ

IDEV and VEU hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and VEU returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF and Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IDEV and VEU hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IDEV and VEU both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIDEVVEU
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA0.87%0.65%
THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK0.63%0.47%
Allianz SE0.60%0.45%
Siemens Energy AG0.57%0.41%
SHOPIFY INC.0.52%0.38%
UBS Group AG0.49%0.36%
Deutsche Telekom AG0.41%0.28%
BANK OF MONTREAL0.38%0.28%
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE0.36%0.27%
GSK PLC0.37%0.27%
Zurich Insurance Group AG0.35%0.27%
CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED0.34%0.25%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IDEVOnly in VEU
ASML Holding N.V. 1.95%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.83%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.09%ASML Holding NV 1.45%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.02%SK hynix Inc 1.24%
Novartis AG 0.97%Tencent Holdings Ltd 0.97%
SHELL PLC 0.90%HSBC Holdings PLC 0.81%
Nestle S.A. 0.90%Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.76%
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 0.78%AstraZeneca PLC 0.73%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.73%Novartis AG 0.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

IDEV and VEU on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore MSCI International Developed MarketsFTSE All-World ex-US
Total return, 1 year+18.7%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.2 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.04%
Already in the S&P 5000.1%0.0%
Holdings22683860

IDEV in plain words

IDEV is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI International Developed Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2268 positions, with the top ten at 10.2%.

VEU in plain words

VEU is an index equity fund tracking the FTSE All-World ex-US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3860 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IDEV or VEU?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IDEV returned +18.7% and VEU returned +22.9%, so VEU returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IDEV or VEU?
IDEV charges 0.04% a year and VEU charges 0.04%, so IDEV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IDEV and VEU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IDEV and 0% of VEU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IDEV against VEU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IDEV against VEU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IDEV-VEU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources