Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IDEV vs ONEQ: how they differ

IDEV and ONEQ hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IDEV and ONEQ hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IDEV and ONEQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIDEVONEQ
SHOPIFY INC.0.52%0.32%
ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD0.09%0.09%
TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD0.09%0.06%
ENLIGHT RENEWABLE ENERGY LTD0.04%0.04%
NOVA LTD0.06%0.04%
Futu Holdings Limited0.03%0.02%
The Descartes Systems Group Inc.0.02%0.02%
FIRSTSERVICE CORPORATION0.02%0.02%
SSR MINING INC.0.02%0.01%
Open Text Corporation0.02%0.01%
ALMONTY INDUSTRIES INC.0.02%0.01%
COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC.0.01%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IDEVOnly in ONEQ
ASML Holding N.V. 1.95%NVIDIA CORP 11.24%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.09%APPLE INC 10.04%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.02%MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%
Novartis AG 0.97%AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%
SHELL PLC 0.90%ALPHABET INC 4.85%
Nestle S.A. 0.90%BROADCOM INC 4.64%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.87%ALPHABET INC 4.48%
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 0.78%TESLA INC 3.58%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IDEV and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesFidelity
What it isCore MSCI International Developed MarketsNasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year+18.7%+20.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.2 pts+3.1 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.21%
Already in the S&P 5000.1%87.4%
Holdings22681022

IDEV in plain words

IDEV is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI International Developed Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2268 positions, with the top ten at 10.2%.

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IDEV or ONEQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IDEV returned +18.7% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IDEV or ONEQ?
IDEV charges 0.04% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so IDEV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IDEV and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IDEV and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IDEV against ONEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IDEV against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IDEV-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources