Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IBB vs VHT: how they differ

IBB and VHT hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and IBB returned more over the year.

iShares Biotechnology ETF and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IBB and VHT hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IBB and VHT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIBBVHT
Amgen, Inc.7.84%2.87%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.6.85%2.64%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.8.09%1.80%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.4.91%1.01%
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.3.12%0.63%
Natera, Inc.2.89%0.47%
Biogen, Inc.2.47%0.46%
Revolution Medicines, Inc.2.78%0.40%
Illumina, Inc.2.07%0.39%
Insmed, Inc.1.79%0.36%
United Therapeutics Corp.1.74%0.36%
Incyte Corp.1.75%0.26%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IBBOnly in VHT
Argenx SE 3.76%Eli Lilly & Co 14.07%
BeOne Medicines Ltd. 1.77%Johnson & Johnson 8.48%
Roivant Sciences Ltd. 1.43%AbbVie Inc 6.10%
Ascendis Pharma A/S 1.29%UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.46%
Genmab A/S 1.12%Merck & Co Inc 4.67%
Abivax SA 0.67%Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 2.93%
Alkermes plc 0.67%Intuitive Surgical Inc 2.39%
BioNTech SE 0.66%Abbott Laboratories 2.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IBB and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IBB
iShares Biotechnology ETF
VHT
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isBiotechnologyHealth Care
Total return, 1 year+41.5%+21.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+24.0 pts+4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.44%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50035.6%85.6%
Holdings248401

IBB in plain words

IBB is an index equity fund tracking the Biotechnology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +41.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 36% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 248 positions, with the top ten at 44.8%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IBB or VHT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBB returned +41.5% and VHT returned +21.6%, so IBB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IBB or VHT?
IBB charges 0.44% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so VHT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IBB and VHT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 36% of IBB and 86% of VHT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IBB against VHT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IBB against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IBB-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources