Which returned more over the last year, HYMB or XLF?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYMB returned +1.7% and XLF returned +7.6%, so XLF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, HYMB or XLF?

HYMB charges 0.35% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so XLF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HYMB vs XLF: how they differ

HYMB and XLF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLF returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HYMB and XLF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HYMB	Only in XLF
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp Sal 2.53%	Berkshire Hathaway Inc 12.10%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp Sal 1.54%	JPMorgan Chase & Co 11.57%
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Aut 1.27%	Visa Inc 7.51%
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 0.64%	Mastercard Inc 5.47%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp Sal 0.62%	Bank of America Corp 4.91%
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 0.55%	Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 3.94%
New York Liberty Development Corp 0.47%	Wells Fargo & Co 3.34%
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority 0.43%	Morgan Stanley 3.31%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

HYMB and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	HYMB State Street(R) SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF	XLF State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	State Street	State Street
What it is	SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond	Financials
Total return, 1 year	+1.7%	+7.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−15.8 pts	−9.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.35%	0.08%
Holdings	1867	76

HYMB in plain words

HYMB is a bond fund tracking the SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 3.8% below its high of Jul 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLF in plain words

XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HYMB or XLF?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYMB returned +1.7% and XLF returned +7.6%, so XLF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HYMB or XLF?: HYMB charges 0.35% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so XLF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HYMB against XLF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HYMB against XLF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HYMB-XLF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources