Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
HYG vs VGSH: how they differ
HYG and VGSH are both bond index funds, and over the year HYG returned more, +2.9% against +1.8%.
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index Fund.
| HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | US high yield bonds | Short-Term Treasury |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.9% | +1.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −14.6 pts | −15.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | not filed | 91 |
HYG in plain words
HYG is a bond fund tracking the US high yield bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year.
VGSH in plain words
VGSH is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HYG or VGSH?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYG returned +2.9% and VGSH returned +1.8%, so HYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, HYG or VGSH?
- HYG charges 0.49% a year and VGSH charges 0.03%, so VGSH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HYG against VGSH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HYG-VGSH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources