Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HDV vs SPMO: how they differ

HDV and SPMO hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.

iShares Core High Dividend ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HDV and SPMO hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions HDV and SPMO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingHDVSPMO
JOHNSON & JOHNSON5.70%3.85%
EXXON MOBIL CORP8.45%2.78%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC4.18%1.29%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)3.88%1.21%
ALTRIA GROUP INC3.71%0.47%
WILLIAMS COMPANIES INC (THE)1.22%0.31%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY INC0.98%0.30%
ENTERGY CORP0.62%0.18%
WEC ENERGY GROUP INC0.59%0.13%
HERSHEY COMPANY (THE)0.34%0.12%
FIRSTENERGY CORP0.41%0.10%
EVERGY INC0.31%0.09%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HDVOnly in SPMO
CHEVRON CORP 6.45%Micron Technology, Inc. 10.72%
ABBVIE INC 5.45%NVIDIA Corp. 8.46%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 4.47%Broadcom Inc. 7.58%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 4.08%Alphabet Inc. 4.81%
PROGRESSIVE CORP (THE) 3.80%Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.14%
MERCK & COMPANY INC 3.78%Alphabet Inc. 3.81%
PEPSICO INC 3.67%Lam Research Corp. 3.54%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 3.55%Intel Corp. 2.95%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

HDV and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isCore High DividendS&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year+22.5%+24.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.0 pts+7.0 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50098.0%100.0%
Holdings7599

HDV in plain words

HDV is an index equity fund tracking the Core High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 50.2%.

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HDV or SPMO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HDV returned +22.5% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HDV or SPMO?
HDV charges 0.08% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so HDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HDV and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of HDV and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HDV against SPMO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HDV against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HDV-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources