Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
GRNY vs SPMO: how they differ
GRNY and SPMO hold 24% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and SPMO hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | GRNY | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.17% | 4.14% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.96% | 4.81% |
| Broadcom Inc | 2.94% | 7.58% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 2.69% | 2.60% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 2.46% | 8.46% |
| General Electric Co | 2.04% | 1.63% |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 2.27% | 1.43% |
| KLA Corp | 2.75% | 1.39% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 2.33% | 1.39% |
| GE Vernova Inc | 3.05% | 1.33% |
| Bank of New York Mellon Corp/T | 2.59% | 0.50% |
| Quanta Services Inc | 3.20% | 0.48% |
| Only in GRNY | Only in SPMO |
|---|---|
| Amazon.com Inc 3.02% | Micron Technology, Inc. 10.72% |
| Strategy Inc 3.01% | Johnson & Johnson 3.85% |
| Arista Networks Inc 2.88% | Alphabet Inc. 3.81% |
| Netflix Inc 2.82% | Lam Research Corp. 3.54% |
| Eaton Corp PLC 2.56% | Intel Corp. 2.95% |
| Cadence Design Systems Inc 2.54% | Exxon Mobil Corp. 2.78% |
| ONEOK Inc 2.49% | Sandisk Corp. 2.46% |
| Air Products and Chemicals Inc 2.48% | Cisco Systems, Inc. 2.02% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF | SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fundstrat | Invesco |
| What it is | Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap | S&P 500 Momentum |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.8% | +24.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −3.7 pts | +7.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.13% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 97.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 40 | 99 |
GRNY in plain words
GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.
SPMO in plain words
SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or SPMO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +13.8% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, GRNY or SPMO?
- GRNY charges 0.75% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do GRNY and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of GRNY and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 24% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GRNY against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GRNY-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources