Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GRNY vs SDY: how they differ

GRNY and SDY hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and GRNY returned more over the year.

Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and SDY hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GRNY and SDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGRNYSDY
Chevron Corp2.46%1.28%
PPG Industries Inc1.95%1.21%
Air Products and Chemicals Inc2.48%1.03%
Caterpillar Inc2.69%0.47%
Northrop Grumman Corp1.92%0.47%
Microsoft Corp2.38%0.36%
Texas Pacific Land Corp2.40%0.21%
Costco Wholesale Corp2.33%0.20%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GRNYOnly in SDY
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.17%Verizon Communications Inc 2.15%
Quanta Services Inc 3.20%Realty Income Corp 2.14%
GE Vernova Inc 3.05%Kenvue Inc 1.76%
Amazon.com Inc 3.02%Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75%
Strategy Inc 3.01%AbbVie Inc 1.63%
Alphabet Inc 2.96%QUALCOMM Inc 1.57%
Broadcom Inc 2.94%Texas Instruments Inc 1.56%
Arista Networks Inc 2.88%Target Corp 1.55%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

GRNY and SDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFundstratState Street
What it isFundstrat Granny Shots US Large CapSPDR S&P Dividend
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+11.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.7 pts−6.5 pts
Expense ratio0.75%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50097.0%84.6%
Holdings40155

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 155 positions, with the top ten at 17.1%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or SDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +13.8% and SDY returned +11.0%, so GRNY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GRNY or SDY?
GRNY charges 0.75% a year and SDY charges 0.35%, so SDY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GRNY and SDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of GRNY and 85% of SDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GRNY against SDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GRNY against SDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GRNY-SDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources