Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GRNY vs IYW: how they differ

GRNY and IYW hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and IYW returned more over the year.

Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF and iShares U.S. Technology ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and IYW hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GRNY and IYW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGRNYIYW
Advanced Micro Devices Inc4.17%3.50%
Alphabet Inc2.96%7.84%
Broadcom Inc2.94%3.78%
NVIDIA Corp2.46%16.25%
Apple Inc2.40%13.65%
Microsoft Corp2.38%3.99%
Meta Platforms Inc2.24%2.81%
Palantir Technologies Inc2.33%1.86%
KLA Corp2.75%1.41%
Cadence Design Systems Inc2.54%0.55%
Strategy Inc3.01%0.32%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GRNYOnly in IYW
Quanta Services Inc 3.20%ALPHABET INC. 6.34%
GE Vernova Inc 3.05%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2.98%
Amazon.com Inc 3.02%INTEL CORPORATION 2.56%
Arista Networks Inc 2.88%LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 1.99%
Netflix Inc 2.82%APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 1.92%
Caterpillar Inc 2.69%ORACLE CORPORATION 1.67%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp/T 2.59%TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED 1.57%
Eaton Corp PLC 2.56%INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORAT 1.32%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

GRNY and IYW on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFundstratiShares
What it isFundstrat Granny Shots US Large CapU.S. Technology
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+34.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.7 pts+17.4 pts
Expense ratio0.75%0.37%
Already in the S&P 50097.0%95.5%
Holdings40139

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

IYW in plain words

IYW is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +34.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 139 positions, with the top ten at 63.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or IYW?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +13.8% and IYW returned +34.9%, so IYW returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GRNY or IYW?
GRNY charges 0.75% a year and IYW charges 0.37%, so IYW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GRNY and IYW overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of GRNY and 96% of IYW by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GRNY against IYW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GRNY against IYW, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GRNY-IYW Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources