Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
GRNY vs IWB: how they differ
GRNY and IWB hold 29% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned more over the year.
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF and iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GRNY and IWB hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | GRNY | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon.com Inc | 3.02% | 3.33% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.96% | 3.00% |
| Broadcom Inc | 2.94% | 2.54% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 2.46% | 6.73% |
| Apple Inc | 2.40% | 6.03% |
| Microsoft Corp | 2.38% | 4.00% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 2.24% | 1.79% |
| Tesla Inc | 2.15% | 1.77% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.17% | 1.36% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | 2.33% | 1.26% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 2.69% | 0.70% |
| Costco Wholesale Corp | 2.33% | 0.60% |
| Only in GRNY | Only in IWB |
|---|---|
| Eaton Corp PLC 2.56% | ALPHABET INC. 2.42% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1.88% | |
| ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 1.38% | |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.34% | |
| INTEL CORPORATION 0.88% | |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.88% | |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 0.83% | |
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 0.82% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF | IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fundstrat | iShares |
| What it is | Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap | Russell 1000 |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.8% | +16.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −3.7 pts | −0.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 97.0% | 91.9% |
| Holdings | 40 | 1024 |
GRNY in plain words
GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.
IWB in plain words
IWB is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1024 positions, with the top ten at 33.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GRNY or IWB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GRNY returned +13.8% and IWB returned +16.7%, so IWB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, GRNY or IWB?
- GRNY charges 0.75% a year and IWB charges 0.15%, so IWB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do GRNY and IWB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 97% of GRNY and 92% of IWB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 29% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GRNY against IWB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GRNY-IWB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources