Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GLDM vs SLV: how they differ

GLDM and SLV are both commodity funds, and over the year SLV returned more, +53.8% against +19.4%.

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust and iShares Silver Trust.

GLDM and SLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isGold MiniSharesSilver
Total return, 1 year+19.4%+53.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.9 pts+36.3 pts
Expense rationot published0.50%

GLDM in plain words

GLDM is a commodity fund tracking the Gold MiniShares. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 19.4% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SLV in plain words

SLV is a commodity fund tracking the Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +53.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. It sat 45.0% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or SLV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +19.4% and SLV returned +53.8%, so SLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GLDM against SLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLDM against SLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GLDM-SLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources