Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or SCHG?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +19.4% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so GLDM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GLDM vs SCHG: how they differ

GLDM is a commodity fund and SCHG an equity index fund, and over the year GLDM returned more, +19.4% against +12.7%.

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

GLDM and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Schwab
What it is	Gold MiniShares	U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year	+19.4%	+12.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.9 pts	−4.8 pts
Expense ratio	not published	0.04%
Holdings	not filed	193

GLDM in plain words

GLDM is a commodity fund tracking the Gold MiniShares. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 19.4% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or SCHG?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +19.4% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so GLDM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GLDM against SCHG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLDM against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GLDM-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources