Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or MAGS?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +19.4% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so GLDM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GLDM vs MAGS: how they differ

GLDM is a commodity fund and MAGS an equity index fund, and over the year GLDM returned more, +19.4% against +14.4%.

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

GLDM and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Roundhill
What it is	Gold MiniShares	Magnificent Seven
Total return, 1 year	+19.4%	+14.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.9 pts	−3.1 pts
Expense ratio	not published	0.30%
Holdings	not filed	9

GLDM in plain words

GLDM is a commodity fund tracking the Gold MiniShares. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 19.4% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or MAGS?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +19.4% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so GLDM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GLDM against MAGS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLDM against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GLDM-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources