Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GLDM vs IAU: how they differ

GLDM and IAU are both commodity funds, and over the year they finished level, +19.4% against +19.2%.

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust and iShares Gold Trust.

GLDM and IAU on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isGold MiniSharesGold
Total return, 1 year+19.4%+19.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.9 pts+1.7 pts
Expense rationot published0.25%

GLDM in plain words

GLDM is a commodity fund tracking the Gold MiniShares. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 19.4% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IAU in plain words

IAU is a commodity fund tracking the Gold. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 19.6% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GLDM or IAU?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLDM returned +19.4% and IAU returned +19.2%, so GLDM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GLDM against IAU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLDM against IAU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GLDM-IAU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources