Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GLD vs SIVR: how they differ

GLD and SIVR are both commodity funds, and over the year SIVR returned more, +54.2% against +19.1%.

SPDR Gold Shares and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF.

GLD and SIVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState Streetabrdn
What it isGoldPhysical Silver
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+54.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts+36.7 pts
Expense ratio0.40%not published

GLD in plain words

GLD is a commodity fund tracking the Gold. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. It sat 19.6% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SIVR in plain words

SIVR is a commodity fund tracking the Physical Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +54.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 44.9% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GLD or SIVR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLD returned +19.1% and SIVR returned +54.2%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GLD against SIVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLD against SIVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GLD-SIVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources