Which returned more over the last year, GLD or NOBL?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLD returned +19.1% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so GLD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, GLD or NOBL?

GLD charges 0.40% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so NOBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GLD vs NOBL: how they differ

GLD is a commodity fund and NOBL an equity index fund, and over the year GLD returned more, +19.1% against +9.4%.

SPDR Gold Shares and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

GLD and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	GLD SPDR Gold Shares	NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	State Street	ProShares
What it is	Gold	S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year	+19.1%	+9.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.6 pts	−8.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.40%	0.35%
Holdings	not filed	69

GLD in plain words

GLD is a commodity fund tracking the Gold. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. It sat 19.6% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

NOBL in plain words

NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GLD or NOBL?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLD returned +19.1% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so GLD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GLD or NOBL?: GLD charges 0.40% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so NOBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GLD against NOBL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLD against NOBL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GLD-NOBL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources