Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
GLD vs JNK: how they differ
GLD is a commodity fund and JNK a bond index fund, and over the year GLD returned more, +19.1% against +3.3%.
SPDR Gold Shares and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF.
| GLD SPDR Gold Shares | JNK State Street(R) SPDR(R) Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | State Street |
| What it is | Gold | SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.1% | +3.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.6 pts | −14.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.40% |
| Holdings | not filed | 1198 |
GLD in plain words
GLD is a commodity fund tracking the Gold. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. It sat 19.6% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
JNK in plain words
JNK is a bond fund tracking the SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GLD or JNK?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GLD returned +19.1% and JNK returned +3.3%, so GLD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, GLD or JNK?
- GLD charges 0.40% a year and JNK charges 0.40%, so GLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLD against JNK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GLD-JNK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources