Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GDXJ vs VTI: how they differ

Over the year GDXJ returned more, +42.4% against +17.2%, and VTI charges 0.03% against 0.52%.

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GDXJ and VTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GDXJ and VTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGDXJVTI
Coeur Mining Inc5.15%0.02%
Hecla Mining Co2.63%0.01%
Hycroft Mining Holding Corp0.45%0.00%
i-80 Gold Corp0.37%0.00%
Contango Silver & Gold Inc0.16%0.00%
Dakota Gold Corp0.19%0.00%
Idaho Strategic Resources Inc0.15%0.00%
US Gold Corp0.07%0.00%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GDXJOnly in VTI
Evolution Mining Ltd 6.38%NVIDIA Corp 6.37%
Equinox Gold Corp 6.28%Apple Inc 5.88%
Alamos Gold Inc 6.23%Microsoft Corp 3.84%
Endeavour Mining PLC 5.33%Amazon.com Inc 3.19%
Industrias Penoles SAB de CV 2.89%Alphabet Inc 2.90%
First Majestic Silver Corp 2.72%Broadcom Inc 2.48%
IAMGOLD Corp 2.62%Alphabet Inc 2.29%
Eldorado Gold Corp 2.49%Micron Technology Inc 1.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

GDXJ and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsThematic ETFCore index fund
IssuerVanEckVanguard
What it isMiners and metalsUS total market
Total return, 1 year+42.4%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+24.9 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.52%0.03%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%88.3%
Holdings1103531

GDXJ in plain words

By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 110 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +42.4% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 24.9 pts. It sits 19.7% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

VTI in plain words

VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GDXJ or VTI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GDXJ returned +42.4% and VTI returned +17.2%, so GDXJ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GDXJ or VTI?
GDXJ charges 0.52% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GDXJ and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of GDXJ and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are GDXJ and VTI the same kind of fund?
No. GDXJ is a thematic ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GDXJ against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GDXJ against VTI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GDXJ-VTI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources