Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
GDXJ vs QQQM: how they differ
Over the year GDXJ returned more, +42.4% against +23.0%, and QQQM charges 0.15% against 0.52%.
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GDXJ and QQQM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GDXJ | Only in QQQM |
|---|---|
| Evolution Mining Ltd 6.38% | NVIDIA Corp. 8.16% |
| Equinox Gold Corp 6.28% | Apple Inc. 7.29% |
| Alamos Gold Inc 6.23% | Microsoft Corp. 5.32% |
| Endeavour Mining PLC 5.33% | Micron Technology, Inc. 4.80% |
| Coeur Mining Inc 5.15% | Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62% |
| Industrias Penoles SAB de CV 2.89% | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.70% |
| First Majestic Silver Corp 2.72% | Alphabet Inc. 3.52% |
| Hecla Mining Co 2.63% | Tesla, Inc. 3.46% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Thematic ETF | Core index fund |
| Issuer | VanEck | Invesco |
| What it is | Miners and metals | Nasdaq-100 |
| Total return, 1 year | +42.4% | +23.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +24.9 pts | +5.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 96.7% |
| Holdings | 110 | 101 |
GDXJ in plain words
By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 110 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +42.4% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 24.9 pts. It sits 19.7% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
QQQM in plain words
QQQM is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GDXJ or QQQM?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GDXJ returned +42.4% and QQQM returned +23.0%, so GDXJ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, GDXJ or QQQM?
- GDXJ charges 0.52% a year and QQQM charges 0.15%, so QQQM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do GDXJ and QQQM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of GDXJ and 97% of QQQM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
- Are GDXJ and QQQM the same kind of fund?
- No. GDXJ is a thematic ETF and QQQM is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GDXJ against QQQM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GDXJ-QQQM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources