Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

GDX vs ITOT: how they differ

Over the year GDX returned more, +40.2% against +17.2%, and ITOT charges 0.03% against 0.51%.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GDX and ITOT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GDX and ITOT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGDXITOT
Newmont Corp10.42%0.14%
Coeur Mining Inc2.38%0.02%
Royal Gold Inc1.95%0.02%
Hecla Mining Co1.38%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in GDXOnly in ITOT
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd 10.67%NVIDIA Corp. 6.64%
Barrick Mining Corp 7.95%Apple, Inc. 5.82%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 5.61%Microsoft Corp. 3.80%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc 5.04%Amazon.com, Inc. 3.20%
Franco-Nevada Corp 4.89%Alphabet, Inc. 2.87%
Kinross Gold Corp 4.40%Broadcom, Inc. 2.45%
Gold Fields Ltd 4.07%Alphabet, Inc. 2.29%
Pan American Silver Corp 2.98%Micron Technology, Inc. 1.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

GDX and ITOT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
Where it sitsThematic ETFCore index fund
IssuerVanEckiShares
What it isMiners and metalsCore S&P Total U.S. Stock Market
Total return, 1 year+40.2%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+22.7 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.51%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50011.0%88.3%
Holdings592497

GDX in plain words

By weight, 11% of GDX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 22.7 pts. It sits 16.2% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

ITOT in plain words

ITOT is an index equity fund tracking the Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2497 positions, with the top ten at 32.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GDX or ITOT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GDX returned +40.2% and ITOT returned +17.2%, so GDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, GDX or ITOT?
GDX charges 0.51% a year and ITOT charges 0.03%, so ITOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GDX and ITOT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 11% of GDX and 88% of ITOT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are GDX and ITOT the same kind of fund?
No. GDX is a thematic ETF and ITOT is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GDX against ITOT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GDX against ITOT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/GDX-ITOT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources