Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FTEC vs VTV: how they differ

FTEC and VTV hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and VTV hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FTEC and VTV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFTECVTV
Micron Technology Inc2.64%4.89%
Cisco Systems Inc1.66%1.57%
Intel Corp1.99%1.05%
International Business Machines Corp0.99%0.99%
QUALCOMM Inc0.92%0.73%
Analog Devices Inc0.95%0.73%
Texas Instruments Inc1.20%0.51%
Salesforce Inc0.77%0.46%
Dell Technologies Inc0.39%0.47%
Corning Inc0.68%0.37%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co0.26%0.23%
Keysight Technologies Inc0.37%0.23%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FTECOnly in VTV
NVIDIA Corp 18.00%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07%
Apple Inc 14.38%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96%
Microsoft Corp 9.54%Johnson & Johnson 2.30%
Broadcom Inc 5.01%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.13%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.60%Walmart Inc 1.87%
Lam Research Corp 1.49%Caterpillar Inc 1.84%
Applied Materials Inc 1.45%AbbVie Inc 1.67%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.40%UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FTEC and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityVanguard
What it isMSCI Information TechnologyUS value
Total return, 1 year+35.7%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+18.2 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50086.2%98.6%
Holdings282308

FTEC in plain words

FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or VTV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and VTV returned +22.9%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or VTV?
FTEC charges 0.08% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTEC and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FTEC against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources