Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FTEC vs VONG: how they differ
FTEC and VONG hold 52% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and VONG hold 52% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTEC | VONG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 18.00% | 13.09% |
| Apple Inc | 14.38% | 11.97% |
| Microsoft Corp | 9.54% | 8.98% |
| Broadcom Inc | 5.01% | 5.78% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.60% | 1.47% |
| Lam Research Corp | 1.49% | 1.21% |
| Oracle Corp | 1.22% | 1.15% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.40% | 1.03% |
| KLA Corp | 1.09% | 0.76% |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 0.69% | 0.68% |
| Amphenol Corp | 0.86% | 0.55% |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 0.55% | 0.55% |
| Only in FTEC | Only in VONG |
|---|---|
| Micron Technology Inc 2.64% | Amazon.com Inc 5.07% |
| Intel Corp 1.99% | Alphabet Inc 3.91% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 1.66% | Tesla Inc 3.48% |
| International Business Machines Corp 0.99% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.20% |
| Analog Devices Inc 0.95% | Alphabet Inc 3.15% |
| Sandisk Corp/DE 0.80% | Eli Lilly & Co 2.67% |
| Western Digital Corp 0.76% | Visa Inc 1.57% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.76% | Costco Wholesale Corp 1.28% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Vanguard |
| What it is | MSCI Information Technology | Russell 1000 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +7.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.2% | 95.6% |
| Holdings | 282 | 387 |
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VONG in plain words
VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or VONG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and VONG returned +7.2%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FTEC or VONG?
- FTEC charges 0.08% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FTEC and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 52% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources