Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FTEC vs VOE: how they differ

FTEC and VOE hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and VOE hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FTEC and VOE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFTECVOE
Keysight Technologies Inc0.37%1.04%
ON Semiconductor Corp0.28%0.64%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co0.26%1.04%
Strategy Inc0.22%0.50%
Roper Technologies Inc0.21%0.59%
Zoom Communications Inc0.19%0.38%
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp0.16%0.32%
NetApp Inc0.16%0.53%
HP Inc0.14%0.35%
Qnity Electronics Inc0.00%0.30%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FTECOnly in VOE
NVIDIA Corp 18.00%Cummins Inc 1.71%
Apple Inc 14.38%Valero Energy Corp 1.34%
Microsoft Corp 9.54%Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.29%
Broadcom Inc 5.01%CRH PLC 1.24%
Micron Technology Inc 2.64%United Rentals Inc 1.23%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.60%General Motors Co 1.21%
Intel Corp 1.99%SLB Ltd 1.21%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.66%Simon Property Group Inc 1.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FTEC and VOE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelityVanguard
What it isMSCI Information TechnologyMid-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+35.7%+20.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+18.2 pts+2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50086.2%96.6%
Holdings282170

FTEC in plain words

FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or VOE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and VOE returned +20.2%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or VOE?
FTEC charges 0.08% a year and VOE charges 0.05%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTEC and VOE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 97% of VOE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FTEC against VOE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against VOE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-VOE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources