Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FTEC vs VLUE: how they differ
FTEC and VLUE hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and VLUE hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTEC | VLUE |
|---|---|---|
| Micron Technology Inc | 2.64% | 11.63% |
| Intel Corp | 1.99% | 9.29% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 1.66% | 4.97% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.45% | 3.67% |
| QUALCOMM Inc | 0.92% | 1.80% |
| Western Digital Corp | 0.76% | 1.89% |
| Dell Technologies Inc | 0.39% | 0.86% |
| ON Semiconductor Corp | 0.28% | 0.78% |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 0.26% | 1.30% |
| Jabil Inc | 0.25% | 0.57% |
| Strategy Inc | 0.22% | 0.30% |
| Roper Technologies Inc | 0.21% | 0.21% |
| Only in FTEC | Only in VLUE |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 18.00% | GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY 3.16% |
| Apple Inc 14.38% | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2.66% |
| Microsoft Corp 9.54% | AT&T INC. 2.53% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.01% | CITIGROUP INC. 1.94% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.60% | BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.88% |
| Lam Research Corp 1.49% | FEDEX CORPORATION 1.69% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc 1.40% | MERCK & CO., INC. 1.57% |
| Oracle Corp 1.22% | COMCAST CORPORATION 1.50% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI Information Technology | MSCI USA Value Factor |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +69.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | +51.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.2% | 96.9% |
| Holdings | 282 | 148 |
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VLUE in plain words
VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or VLUE?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FTEC or VLUE?
- FTEC charges 0.08% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FTEC and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against VLUE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-VLUE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources