Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FTEC vs VGT: how they differ
FTEC and VGT hold 91% of their weight in the same names.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and VGT hold 91% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTEC | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 18.00% | 16.85% |
| Apple Inc | 14.38% | 14.59% |
| Microsoft Corp | 9.54% | 9.47% |
| Broadcom Inc | 5.01% | 4.21% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 2.64% | 4.21% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.60% | 3.21% |
| Intel Corp | 1.99% | 2.03% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 1.66% | 1.85% |
| Lam Research Corp | 1.49% | 1.56% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.45% | 1.40% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.40% | 1.35% |
| Oracle Corp | 1.22% | 1.46% |
| Only in FTEC | Only in VGT |
|---|---|
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.76% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.81% |
| Accenture PLC 0.53% | Accenture PLC 0.47% |
| NXP Semiconductors NV 0.40% | NXP Semiconductors NV 0.38% |
| TE Connectivity PLC 0.34% | Flex Ltd 0.31% |
| Flex Ltd 0.25% | TE Connectivity PLC 0.28% |
| Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.21% | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.22% |
| Fabrinet 0.21% | Fabrinet 0.14% |
| JFrog Ltd 0.08% | JFrog Ltd 0.11% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | VGT Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Vanguard |
| What it is | MSCI Information Technology | Information technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +35.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | +17.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.2% | 86.9% |
| Holdings | 282 | 317 |
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VGT in plain words
VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or VGT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and VGT returned +35.4%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FTEC or VGT?
- FTEC charges 0.08% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so FTEC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FTEC and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 91% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against VGT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-VGT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources