Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FTEC vs SPYG: how they differ
FTEC and SPYG hold 51% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and SPYG hold 51% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTEC | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 18.00% | 13.66% |
| Microsoft Corp | 9.54% | 7.81% |
| Apple Inc | 14.38% | 5.99% |
| Broadcom Inc | 5.01% | 5.04% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 2.64% | 3.67% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.60% | 2.67% |
| Lam Research Corp | 1.49% | 1.53% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.45% | 1.62% |
| KLA Corp | 1.09% | 1.11% |
| Sandisk Corp/DE | 0.80% | 0.95% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.40% | 0.75% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 1.66% | 0.69% |
| Only in FTEC | Only in SPYG |
|---|---|
| Intel Corp 1.99% | Alphabet Inc 5.91% |
| Texas Instruments Inc 1.20% | Alphabet Inc 4.71% |
| Analog Devices Inc 0.95% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.49% |
| QUALCOMM Inc 0.92% | Amazon.com Inc 3.48% |
| Salesforce Inc 0.77% | Eli Lilly & Co 2.67% |
| Western Digital Corp 0.76% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.58% |
| Accenture PLC 0.53% | Tesla Inc 2.07% |
| Adobe Inc 0.50% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.68% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | SPYG State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | State Street |
| What it is | MSCI Information Technology | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.7% | +17.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +18.2 pts | +0.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.2% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 282 | 147 |
FTEC in plain words
FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPYG in plain words
SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or SPYG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FTEC or SPYG?
- FTEC charges 0.08% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FTEC and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 51% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources