Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FTEC vs SCHG: how they differ

FTEC and SCHG hold 46% of their weight in the same names, and FTEC returned more over the year.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FTEC and SCHG hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FTEC and SCHG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFTECSCHG
NVIDIA Corp18.00%11.02%
Apple Inc14.38%9.84%
Microsoft Corp9.54%7.18%
Broadcom Inc5.01%4.55%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc2.60%2.94%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.40%1.25%
KLA Corp1.09%0.88%
Palo Alto Networks Inc0.69%0.80%
Salesforce Inc0.77%0.62%
Arista Networks Inc0.89%0.57%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc0.55%0.64%
AppLovin Corp0.51%0.58%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FTECOnly in SCHG
Micron Technology Inc 2.64%Amazon.com Inc 5.68%
Intel Corp 1.99%Alphabet Inc 4.76%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.66%Tesla Inc 3.92%
Lam Research Corp 1.49%Alphabet Inc 3.78%
Applied Materials Inc 1.45%Meta Platforms Inc 3.46%
Oracle Corp 1.22%Eli Lilly & Co 3.06%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.20%Visa Inc 1.92%
International Business Machines Corp 0.99%Costco Wholesale Corp 1.48%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FTEC and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelitySchwab
What it isMSCI Information TechnologyU.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+35.7%+12.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+18.2 pts−4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50086.2%95.4%
Holdings282193

FTEC in plain words

FTEC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Information Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FTEC or SCHG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTEC returned +35.7% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so FTEC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or SCHG?
FTEC charges 0.08% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FTEC and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 86% of FTEC and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 46% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FTEC against SCHG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTEC against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FTEC-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources